Playground
Hydrogen energy level diagram with transition arrows and photon wavelength.
Variables
| Symbol | Name | SI | Dimension | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy of level noutput Bound-state energy of electron in level n | J | M·L²·T⁻² | -2.18e-18 – 0 | |
| Principal quantum number Energy level index | dimensionless | 1 | 1 – 20 |
Deep dive
Derivation
Bohr postulated quantized angular momentum L = nℏ for circular orbits. Combining centripetal force = Coulomb attraction (m_e v²/r = ke²/r²) with L = m_e v r = nℏ yields r_n = n²a_0 (a_0 ≈ 0.529 Å) and E_n = −ke²/(2r_n) = −13.6 eV/n². The full Schrödinger solution in a Coulomb potential reproduces the same energies.
Experimental verification
Hydrogen Balmer series (n→2) measured by Ångström and Balmer in the 1880s; fits 1/λ = R(1/n_f² − 1/n_i²) with R = 1.097×10⁷ m⁻¹ to 8 decimal places. Lyman, Paschen, Brackett, and Pfund series confirmed the formula. Spectral lines of stars are how we know the universe is made mostly of hydrogen.
Common misconceptions
- Electrons do not literally orbit the nucleus — quantum mechanics gives probability clouds, not classical paths.
- The Bohr model fails for atoms with more than one electron (ignores electron-electron repulsion).
- Negative energy means *bound*, not negative kinetic energy. Ionization sets E = 0.
Real-world applications
- Stellar spectroscopy — chemical composition and redshift of stars and galaxies.
- Hydrogen masers and atomic clocks.
- Lasers (e.g., HeNe, hydrogen plasma lines).
- Astrophysical 21 cm hydrogen line — used to map galactic structure.
Worked examples
Energy of n = 2 level
Given:
- n:
- 2
Find: E_2
Solution
E_2 = −13.6/4 = −3.4 eV
n=2 → n=1 transition wavelength (Lyman α)
Given:
- n_i:
- 2
- n_f:
- 1
Find: λ
Solution
ΔE = 10.2 eV → λ = 1240/10.2 ≈ 121.6 nm (UV)
Scenarios
What if…
- scenario:
- What if the nucleus had Z = 2 (helium ion He⁺)?
- answer:
- E_n = −13.6 × Z²/n² = −54.4/n² eV. Ground state is 4× deeper, ionization energy 54.4 eV — observable in stellar coronas.
- scenario:
- What if the electron were replaced by a muon (200× heavier)?
- answer:
- Muonic hydrogen has E_n scaled by m_μ/m_e ≈ 207 → ground state ≈ −2.8 keV, and Bohr radius ~200× smaller. Used to probe proton charge radius.
- scenario:
- What if n were not restricted to integers?
- answer:
- The classical orbits would form a continuum, atoms would be unstable, and the sharp spectral lines we observe would be impossible — quantization is essential.
Limiting cases
- condition:
- n = 1
- result:
- E_1 = −13.6 eV
- explanation:
- Ground state — most tightly bound; ionization energy of hydrogen.
- condition:
- n → ∞
- result:
- E_n → 0
- explanation:
- Continuum threshold — electron is just barely free (ionization).
- condition:
- Z > 1 (hydrogenic ions)
- result:
- E_n = −13.6 Z²/n² eV
- explanation:
- Higher nuclear charge binds the electron Z² more tightly (e.g., He⁺: −54.4 eV ground state).
Context
Niels Bohr · 1913
Bohr postulated quantized orbits to explain hydrogen's discrete spectrum, ushering in old quantum theory.
Hook
Why are atomic spectra made of sharp lines instead of a rainbow?
Find the energy of the n=2 level of hydrogen and the wavelength of the n=2 → n=1 transition.
Dimensions: [E_n] = [m_e e⁴]/[ε_0² h²] → energy ✓ (Rydberg constant has units of inverse length when expressed via 1/λ)
Validity: Exact for one-electron hydrogenic atoms (H, He⁺, Li²⁺, ...) ignoring fine structure. Multi-electron atoms require quantum mechanics with electron-electron interactions; relativistic corrections are needed for heavy nuclei.